I don’t have Angels GM Tony Reagins on speed dial, he doesn’t consult me on what offers he has on the table. (Not yet, at least.) So I will preface what follows with the understanding that I don’t know for sure what the Angels would have had to surrender to acquire Miguel Cabrera from the Marlins.

I do, however, know what it took for the Tigers to get him (and Dontrelle Willis, just for funsies). Two monster prospects in outfielder Cameron Maybin and lefty Andrew Miller, a 28 year old catcher who hit .258 in 51 games last season (Mike Rabelo), and three minor league pitchers, none of whom are older than 24. No doubt, that’s a hefty package of young talent. But good as they are, Miller and Maybin weren’t counted on to play large roles in Detroit’s quest to get back to the World Series this year. Maybin, who hit .148 in 24 games, clearly needed more seasoning, while Miller (5-5, 5.69 in 13 starts) might not have cracked the Tigers’ rotation coming out of spring training.

A lot to give up? Sure. But with Cabrera and Willis- who doesn’t have to be a #1 for pitching blessed Detroit- the Tigers are absolutely loaded heading into ‘08. And with this deal, they’re participating in that most American of constructs: Buy now, pay later.

It’s something the Angels could, and should, have done, too.

Reports have varied as to what Florida wanted for the pleasure of making Miggy an Angel. Howie Kendrick for sure, Jeff Mathis (highly likely, considering the Marlins picked up a backstop in today’s deal), then some combination of pitchers Nick Adenhart and Ervin Santana. The LA Times reports that the Angels were willing to deal one, between Adenhart and Santana, but not both. I’ve heard or read other names as the fourth guy in the deal. Brandon Wood. Joe Saunders. Reggie Willits.

If it took Adenhart and Santana to get a deal done, I’d have pulled the trigger. If it took tossing Willits, a guy who seemingly doesn’t have a job anymore in Anaheim, I’d have made that happen. Unlike the Dodgers, who couldn’t meet Florida’s asking price without sacrificing too much talent already counted on to produce for the big club this spring, the Angels had the luxury of offering up a lot of guys they didn’t necessarily need in 2008, and perhaps even ‘09. Kendrick is a great player and will win a batting title someday, but he’d have been the only valuable piece off the Angels’ big league roster to head east in the deals bandied about over the last few weeks. Adenhart finished ‘07 at Double-A, and wouldn’t have been on the roster coming out of spring training. Santana showed progress in ‘06, but slipped badly in ‘07. With the Angels currently sporting a stacked starting staff, he might not have made the top five.

Mathis? Replaceable with Mike Napoli. Wood? Reagins said today on the radio today that all things being equal, he wasn’t likely to win a gig heading into the season, despite the trade of Orlando Cabrera.

All of these players could turn out to be top notch major league players. Odds say they won’t, but it’s possible. But in Cabrera (we’re talking Miguel again), the Angels could have had perhaps the best young player the National League had to offer. A guy that, assuming Arte Moreno was willing to pay in a couple years, that the Angels could build around for the next decade. Not a bad pickup for a team starving for consistent, crunch time offense like Bill Belichick is starving for friends. Are you telling me Ervin Santana, the guy who in 2007 saw opponents hit at a .294 clip and sported a grotesque 8.38 ERA away from Angel Stadium is such a slam dunk that he’s worth putting in the way of getting Miguel Cabrera?

I wrote last week that the Angels had a unique opportunity to make a big splash, even at a big cost. The deal I’d have accepted included Brandon Wood to go with Adenhart and Kendrick, if that’s what it took. Again, two guys who won’t be around in the fall plus another who will in exchange for a potential Hall of Fame bat. Robbing Peter to pay Paul? Perhaps. But Peter does pretty well in the interim.  Now Peter watches as Detroit vaults over Los Angeles in the race for the American League (at least on paper, which is where games are played in December). 

You thought Boston was their only Green Goblin?

If the reports are to be believed, the Angels might have had a deal that didn’t include Wood, if they’d have pulled the trigger. And maybe it was never that cut and dried for the Angels. Maybe Florida kept upping the ante. Certainly Detroit paid a high price to get Cabrera, with Willis tossed in as sweetener. Hopefully the guys L.A.A. kept will do the organization proud down the road.

I know Cabrera would have.

Brian Kamenetzky hosts the Lakers Blog and Blue Notes: A Dodgers Blog for the LA Times.com. He’s a contributing writer to ESPN The Magazine and ESPN.com. Write him at bk@sportshubla.com.

Discuss:



6 Responses to “Miguel Cabrera Heads to Detroit: Did the Angels Miss the Boat?”

  1. 1 Rob McMillin

    I find myself wholly puzzled by Reagins’ ability to throw money around and solve one problem by making a bigger one (i.e., following up the Gary Matthews, Jr. signing with an even more expensive deal for Torii Hunter), yet he seems unable to pull the trigger on a deal for a top three third baseman, and a young one at that. The only thing I can think of is that the Tigers were dealing from real surplus where the Angels would have seriously gutted their future were they to send Howie Kendrick and one or two more very good players.

  2. 2 Brian Kamenetzky

    Rob-

    Yes, and no on the future thing. I love Kendrick, and losing him would have stung… but good as he will be, Cabrera is better. As for the other guys, obviously they’re all young and can improve. I’ve never seen Adenhart live, but from all the reports, he sounds very good. Napoli I think does a good enough job to absorb the loss of Mathis.

    I just think it would be a shame, if it indeed came down to Ervin Santana, to not have pulled the trigger. Yeah, he’s got a live arm, but he was also beat around pretty good last year, and the Halos have a lot of pitching. In the end, the math says only a couple of those guys will become high quality Major League players. Meanwhile, other than maybe Albert Pujols, it’s hard to think of a better pure hitter than Cabrera, and while they give up some future to get him, he’s so young that they invest in it at the same time.

    The Angels could have delayed any negative impact on this deal for at least a couple of seasons. That to me makes it worth doing. Detroit (especially after the Renteria deal where they gave up some good young talent) certainly risked the future, for sure. But if you have a real, legitimate chance to win now, it’s worth taking. But you’re right, they do seem very willing to toss money around… yet that Angel Way of holding on to prospects doesn’t die easily…

    Thanks for the note.

  3. 3 Memphis

    I’m giving Reagins one, and only one benefit of the doubt here. I’m going to assume that the Marlins would not have dealt Cabrera before the winter meetings no matter what. They were going to go to the meetings and explore all their options with every team possible as any other team would looking for the best deal. Then even if we had a Kendrick, Mathis, Adenhart, Santana package in place, I think the Tigers still would have won out. However if the Angels did have the chance to seal this deal before, then wow… Reagins needs to be fired yesterday.

  1. 1 Films For Film Literacy » Blog Archive » Miguel Cabrera Heads to Detroit: Did the Angels Miss the Boat?
  2. 2 The Angels Still Rule the West... How About the Rest of the AL? at SportsHubLA
  3. 3 Shows What I Know: Early Returns Say The Angels Were Correct to Pass on Cabrera at SportsHubLA

Leave a Reply





Subscribe to the SportsBrief

Latest Columns

Latest SportsBrief

Polls

  • Does Marcus Camby make the Clippers a playoff team?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Sponsors