I’m not entirely sure it’s a good idea to write a post that essentially explains my NCAA Tourney pool bracket, because a) doing so might reveal a certain bias in whatever analysis I present both here and going forward (let’s get one thing straight- there is nothing more exciting than nailing as many picks as possible in your bracket, then waving that piece of paper in front of friends, family, and co-workers, particularly those who lost their national champion in the second round), and b) revealing my choices publicly could jinx them, simultaneously making it impossible for the aforementioned gloating to take place and opening me up to ridicule.

Still, this is SportsHubLA.com (tell all your friends!), and aside from the purple and gold, there’s no bigger story in town than Ben Howland’s Bruins. Office pool be damned, they merit some virtual ink.

So without further ado, I present my official UCLA preview, wherein I explain how they’ll get to the Final Four, then the title game… before losing to North Carolina, a final chosen by, I believe, 73% of the country:

WHY UCLA WILL WIN (ALMOST ALL) THEIR GAMES:

  • Killer backcourt play. You can’t win without guards, and even before Russell Westbrook busted out, the Bruins still had one of the best in Darren Collison. Put the two of them together, and it’s as good a pairing as you’ll find in the field. A great combination of offensive skill, quickness, and defensive tenacity.
  • Speaking of D, the Bruins are one of the only teams around who can keep opponents from scoring for minutes at a time. So while they’re not the most dynamic offensive team in the nation (though they’re better than they get credit for), even when they fall behind- a habit they might want to break, by the way- the Bruins are never out of a game because they can lock down like a collegiate version of the Celtics.
  • Been there, done that. UCLA has a tournament tested coach coaching tournament tested players. Nobody’s gonna freak out, or start flinging the ball around like a grenade when the team hits a rough patch. Experience matters.
  • Balance. Collison and Westbrook on the outside, Josh Shipp with the midrange game, Kevin Love inside and out, Luc Richard Mbah a Moute doing all the dirty work, Lorenzo Mata-Real to play the heavy in the post, when need be. No real holes, and for all their success, this is the first time the Bruins have a great inside presence. Huge boost to their title hopes.

HOW THEY’LL GET THERE:

Round One, vs. Mississippi Valley State (16)

Located about five miles from Greenwood and referred to by those in the know simply as “The Valley,” UCLA’s first round opponent has a great nickname (Delta Devils, Devilettes for the ladies), perfectly nice colors (green and white), and a host of famous alumni, including NFL greats Deacon Jones and Jerry Rice. That’s about all you need to know about them. Sure, there’s always the chance a 16 seed will knock off a one, but honestly I’m not entirely sure most people want to see it happen… at least not to their number one. At the very least, I’m willing to bet that despite L.A.’s love for great Hollywood stories, it’ll be a big night for the torch and pitchfork crowd if the Bruins end up on the wrong side of history.

Round Two, vs. BYU (8)

The Cougars, who will have beaten Texas A&M to reach the second round, are a snazzy little team. They’ve dominated the Mountain West for the last couple seasons, and at 25, their RPI rank is higher than Notre Dame, USC, Oklahoma, West Virginia, and Arkansas. They are not to be trifled with. Their leading scorer and rebounder is 6′11″ Trevor Plaisted, who put up 24/17 against North Carolina earlier in the year. Given that Love has struggled at times against strong, active bigs, there might be reason to worry. BYU runs with three guards, are fundamentally sound, and are plucky because all BYU teams are plucky and fundamentally sound. Still, after the Cougars knocked off UCLA in the Las Vegas Bowl, I refuse to predict an upset here and say definitively that L.A. is Provo’s bitch.

Sweet 16, vs. Connecticut (4)

UConn beats San Diego and Drake to reach this point, but here’s where the party ends. I’m not a Big East guy. Never have been. Even when a team or two manages to go deep into the tourney, I still don’t think the conference is anything but overrated by an east coast media machine who really, really want some of these squads to rise to former glory. They all cram into the Top 25 by scoring wins here and there against each other.

UConn did beat Indiana in Bloomington, but also lost to Gonzaga and Memphis out of conference. I’m not saying it’s a conference full of garbage teams- there’s always an elite squad somewhere in there- but when it comes down to it, I’ll generally default to the assumption that its representatives will lose. Unfounded personal bias? Maybe, perhaps likely. But even if you’re not like me and love the Big East, you should love UCLA more, at least in regards to this game.

Elite Eight, vs. Xavier (3)

I love this game. This might be my favorite non-Final Four matchup of the tournament, and I really hope it happens. How can you not like a team called the Muskateers, led by a 4′3″ point guard? Okay, Drew Lavender (great name, and it’s a shame he wasn’t around during the ABA era) might be 5′7″, but who cares? They’re a balanced, with experienced senior guards in Lavender and Stanley Burrell. Moreover, Xavier features a sophomore center named Jason Love, meaning someone somewhere gets to write the “Love is all you need” headline when it’s over.

They’ve beaten Creighton, K-State, Indiana, ASU, and gave Tennessee a quality run. But if you can keep them from scoring, something UCLA can do to anyone, they’re plenty beatable. Final Four, ho!

Final Four, vs. Texas (2)

I’ve got the Longhorns coming out of the South, and holy crap, they’ve got the potential to be really, really good- better than last year’s Kevin Durant Show, and a more highly evolved version of the team that beat UCLA 63-61 at Pauley on December 2. In that game, Texas threw a zone at the Bruins that hurt them early, but once UCLA figured it out they were able to get things done, nearly overcoming a 12 point halftime deficit. Love had a horrible day in what was his first truly big game in front of the LA crowd. Play this one 100 times, and they might just split 50/50.

Why does UCLA win the coin flip this time around? Every year, the Bruins seem to win one game in the tournament by the sheer force of Ben Howland’s stare searing his will into the head of every Bruins player, like a coaching version of Superman’s heat vision. This is that game.

Championship Game, vs. North Carolina (1, East)

This should be epic. The Heels and Bruins are actually a lot alike. Great guard play (Ty Lawson might be the only top shelf guard in the country faster than Collison), a dominating inside presence (Tyler Hansbrough), and have a tourney chip on their shoulder (UNC had a disappointing ‘07 tourney, knocked off by Georgetown in the Elite Eight last year, for UCLA, two straight Final Four trips without a trophy will do that). I just feel like Carolina is a little too big, a little too athletic… a little too everything for the Bruins.

And they have the misfortune of having to battle Hansbrough in what might- might- be his last game as a Heel. We’re talking about a kid who seems to be the embodiment of college hoops. He literally bleeds for the game, has a funny looking shot, and turns pink when he exerts himself like some sort of sharp-elbowed Norman Rockwell subject. Plus, while a lot of people love to think of him as tough, he’s actually slightly crazy, which is much, much better.

Just like last year against Florida, the Bruins will make it to the end of the rainbow, only to be squashed by the pot of gold. Disappointing, yes, but it beats a second round upset, right?

Brian Kamenetzky hosts the Lakers Blog and Blue Notes: A Dodgers Blog for the LA Times.com. He’s a contributing writer to ESPN The Magazine and ESPN.com, and can be heard regularly on the Steve Mason Show, on 710 ESPN radio in LA. Write him at bk@sportshubla.com.

Discuss:



17 Responses to “UCLA to the NCAA Tournament Championship!... (where, unfortunately, they'll lose)”

  1. 1 michael

    Disagree that big east is overrated, the top half of that conference (8 or 9 teams) is really strong, which makes it the best conference in the sport; it’s rpi diffused by the weaklings in the bottom the 16 team goliath. And how can you really say the big east is over -rated when they’ve won 3 of the last 9 national championships and have the more nba players than any other conference - and Connecticut has more nba players than any other school?

    That being said, I agree with you exactly, Carolina will beat UCLA in the national championship. I frankly would be surprised if that is not how it works out.

  2. 2 Brian Kamenetzky

    Michael-

    Well, like I mention, it’s probably a personal bias. It’s not that they suck- clearly the conference is good- I just feel like no matter what the state of the Big East might be, people (media, I mean) love to pump it up anyway. I’m an SEC/Pac-10/Big 12 type… and I loves me some mid-majors!

    Thanks for the comment. I hope we’re right about UNC/UCLA. I could use the cash (haha).

  3. 3 John Krolik

    Love won’t be able to get within the area code of the basket against DeAndre or HASHEEM THABEET. (I’ve decided his name should always be in all caps.)

  4. 4 michael

    j krolik,

    agree with you regarding Thabeet (dude could be the number 1 pick in the draft if he stays in school another year and learns more hoops -he’s only played organized ball for like 4 or 5 years) - and that UCONN team is the one team in the west region that should give UCLA a real threat, they match up with the Bruins almost perfectly. But UCLA will find a way to win that possible game, in probably another miraculous way.

  5. 5 DK TRUEBLUE

    Where is daniel? My favorite UCLA and Laker hating blogger. Funny how quiet you have been since the Lakers are in 1st place and the Bruins have a #1 seed and are playing there best basketball of the season. I know your readin this somewhere daniel so Id love to hear what youve got to say now buddy!

  6. 6 Phil Gurnee

    Pitt for the money bracket, UCLA for the fun bracket.

    For those stuck at work

    http://tinyurl.com/24pj4p

  7. 7 daniel

    DK TRUEBLUE

    UCLA needed two more close wins to win the pac-10, the lakers are where they are when we last spoke, in first place (where they’ll finish) although now they’re tied and more banged up…and as I said before, i was rooting for the Bruins to win the pac-10 tournament, I didn’t want them to run out of luck before it catches up to them in the tournament that counts. And you must be happy the basketball gods gave them the easist path to the final game possible, but no fretting here….i like them getting all the way to that championship game too, and like I’ve always said, it’s where they’ll show their true colors: being the second or third best team in the country. Like BK said - no shame in that, it’s better than losing in the second round…

    as for the Lakers, we’ll see, but I may be the only person in the country outside of San Antonio and Cleveland looking forward to what I expect: a repeat of last year’s finals.

  8. 8 Brian Kamenetzky

    Well, Xavier almost made me look stupid far earlier than I normally do…

  9. 9 Mike D

    I hate to add fuel to this Big East fire, but I just have a feeling that Rick Pitino will find a way to get by UNC. Plus it’s one of those short turn around games where there is virtually no time to prepare & I think Pitino’s style is to hectic. I’m not thrilled the game is in Charlotte, but Pitino usually gets the most out of his players. I also have Pitt going to the final four. They ripped thru the Big East Tourney & kept it going today. My other final four teams are UCLA & Kansas. I have UCLA beating L’Ville for the title..

  10. 10 A. Marino

    I disagree with few points. First, the Big East is not an overrated conference. Now I will disclose that I am a St. John’s Alum so I also have a personal bias. But they consitently do well inteh tourny with Championships in 99 (UConn), 2003 (Syracuse) and 2004 (UConn). Plus, Georgetown in last years final four.

    With respect to this year’s tounry, I agree that UCLA should be able to drop UConn. UConn would pose a danger to many teams in the tourny, but UCLA is not one of them. I also disagree with your final pick. I think Louisville will take care of UNC and G’Town will take care of Kansas, eventually leavingG’Town to play UCLA for the championship. Now, while you think I am going to put G’Town over the top, I’m not. This is UCLA’s year. They are a great team and I think their toughest game will be against Texas inteh Final Four and they will win that one and the Championship.

  11. 11 Brian Kamenetzky

    A Marino-

    You’re right, there are always some good teams at the top, but I just feel like those middle ones get more love than they should by virtue of their Big Eastness. And given how my brackets did yesterday, I can see why you (or anyone, for that matter) would question the wisdom of my forecast (haha). I still like my Final Four, though.

    I have Georgetown out in the eight, by the way. Thanks for the note.

  1. 1 UCLA to the NCAA Tournament Championship!… (where, unfortunately ...
  2. 2 final four bracket
  3. 3 espn.com
  4. 4 virtual west virginia
  5. 5 uconn basketball radio
  6. 6 Skin of Their Teeth: Defense Leads UCLA Past Texas A&M at SportsHubLA

Leave a Reply





Subscribe to the SportsBrief

Latest Columns

Latest SportsBrief

Polls

  • Will the Lakers or Celtics win when they play on Xmas Day?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Sponsors